Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032421›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Rivers in transition: Local perceptions of a Swedish dam removal.

Emma Gudmundson, Sanna Stålhammar, Henrik Thorén, John J Piccolo, Johannes Persson, P Anders Nilsson, Gary Brierley, Anna Scaini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma GudmundsonDepartment of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sanna StålhammarDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-2640
Henrik ThorénDepartment of Philosophy, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6356-2022
John J PiccoloRiver Ecology and Management Research Group (RivEM), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-4178
Johannes PerssonDepartment of Philosophy, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-1850
P Anders NilssonDepartment of Biology - Aquatic Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, Naturvetarvägen 6A, 22362, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-9835
Gary BrierleySchool of Environment, University of Auckland (Waipapa Taumata Rau), Auckland (Tamaki Makaurau), Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-1105
Anna ScainiDepartment of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.scaini@natgeo.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-0241

Funding

EU-LIFE LIFE23/NAT/SE/101148230-IALSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2022-00329Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2022-01804Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2024-01093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective and locally supported river restoration requires attention to the social dimensions of rivers. This paper examines local perceptions of hydropower and restoration in the river Rönne å, an early case under Sweden's National Plan for Modern Environmental Conditions for Hydropower. A mixed-methods approach, including a questionnaire and qualitative interviews, explores how inhabitants relate to their river and view the removal of three low-production dams, offering one of the most detailed assessments of stakeholder values in a Swedish hydropower river. The findings reveal important tensions between energy production and ecological restoration: While hydropower retains cultural legitimacy, support declines when ecological costs outweigh energy benefits. The river holds strong recreational, cultural, and symbolic meanings, embedding dam removals in broader sociocultural contexts rather than solely technical or ecological. These findings highlight the importance of participatory efforts and governance that align ecological goals with the diverse ways people relate to rivers.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPower PlantsRiversHumansPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenDam removalHuman–river relationsHydropowerMixed-methodsRiver restorationSociocultural values

Identifiers

PMID42032421
PMCPMC13661868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.