Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032413›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2026

Reproductive Toxicity of Wildfire Smoke.

L M Sosedova, V A Vokina, A A Pankova, V S Rukavishnikov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L M SosedovaEast-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, Russia. sosedlar@mail.ru.
V A VokinaEast-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, Russia.
A A PankovaEast-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, Russia.
V S RukavishnikovEast-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the effect of peat smoke intoxication in pregnant rats on the early postnatal development of the second-generation offspring. The smoke was inhaled on days 14-18 of pregnancy. The first-generation offspring at puberty (3 months) was mated to produce the second-generation offspring in the following 3 variants: females exposed to prenatal smoke and intact males (experiment 1), males exposed to prenatal smoke and intact females (experiment 2), and males and females exposed to prenatal smoke (experiment 3); intact females and males comprised the control group. In the second-generation offspring, physical development, body weight gain dynamics, rate of maturation of sensorimotor reflexes, and parameters of open-field behavior were assessed. The results showed that exposure to peat smoke in pregnant rats reduced survival rates and impaired physical development in the second-generation offspring.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsReproductionSmokeWildfiresAnimalsAnimals, NewbornFemaleMaleMaternal ExposurePregnancyRatsSmokenewborn rat offspringpeat smokephysical developmentprenatal exposuresurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID42032413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.