ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Mental Health Professionals' Perspectives of the Role of Spirituality, Religion and Culture on the Mental Health of African Australians.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences and Views of African Australian Consumers on the Role of Spirituality, Religion and Culture on Mental Health.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Australia is one of the most culturally diverse countries, with nearly half its population identifying as culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD). Among this diversity, African Australians now number nearly 400,000, reflecting global migration trends. Research indicates that people from the Horn of Africa and East Africa are at higher risk of developing psychosis, yet they face significant disparities in mental health care access and quality in Australia. This qualitative study investigates the experiences of 15 healthcare professionals who have worked with African Australian service users. Using semi-structured interviews, Thematic Analysis (TA) and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) the study explores the influence of spirituality, religion, and culture on mental health outcomes. Three key themes as well as subthemes merged: the service user experience (including both positive and negative influences), Intersecting Systemic and Community-Based Barriers to Mental Health Care (Systemic Barriers, Language and Mental Health Literacy, Family and Community Influence on Care Decisions, Internalised Stigma, Dishonour, and Diagnostic Labelling) and Systemic Inadequacies in Addressing Cultural Diversity (Lack of Engagement with Family, Community, and Spiritual Leaders, Diversity in the Mental Health Workforce, Cultural Training for Staff, Need for African Peer Support Workers / Cultural Liaisons, Cultural Formulation and Diagnostic Limitations). The findings highlight a growing disconnect between mainstream mental health services and the specific needs of African Australians. Participants stressed the importance of culturally informed assessments, community engagement, and the inclusion of African liaison officers and workers with lived experience to improve trust and care delivery. They also advocated for increasing workforce diversity and enhancing cultural competence training for practitioners. Such training should include understanding religious and cultural values, using interpreters effectively, and involving families in treatment planning. Overall, the study reveals the urgent need for a culturally responsive mental health framework that addresses systemic barriers and promotes equitable care for African Australians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42032387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.