ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2026
A Person-Centred Approach to Adolescent Emotion Regulation Motives, Strategies, and Perceived Efficacies.
Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research utilised the new Process of Emotion Regulation Measure (PERM) to assess emotion regulation motives, selected strategies, and perceived efficacies in a longitudinal community sample of 951 adolescents. We conducted Latent Profile Analyses (LPA) to identify distinct emotion regulation styles and random intercept-latent transition analysis (RI-LTA) to reveal rates of stability and change of profile membership over time. Both LPA and RI-LTA suggested the optimal profile solution was constituted by five emotion regulation profiles: hypo-regulating, hyper-regulating, adaptive, maladaptive, and normative. Each profile evidenced a unique relationship to mental health outcomes, both concurrently and longitudinally. Valenced emotion regulation patterns (evident in the adaptive and maladaptive groups) appeared to manifest the strongest relationships with adolescent mental health. As expected, maladaptive emotion regulation styles were related to poorer wellbeing outcomes, and adaptive emotion regulation styles were related to better wellbeing outcomes. Using a hypo- or hyper-regulating style appeared to influence deviations from the norm for negative outcomes such as anxiety and depression, but they had a minimal influence on positive outcomes such as optimism and resilience. RI-LTA exhibited a general trend toward adaptiveness and showed that unhelpful emotion regulation styles were considerably more transient than helpful emotion regulation styles over a five-month period. Our findings underscore the importance of utilising process-based measures and person-centered analyses when studying adolescent emotion regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.