ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026
Use of CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewDespite the established efficacy and safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) worldwide, evidence from East Asian countries remains limited and may differ from that in Western countries. RECENT
findingsThis narrative review comprehensively summarises clinical trials and real-world studies on CGRP mAbs in East Asian populations. A total of 12 clinical trials and 23 real-world studies on galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab in East Asia were identified through MEDLINE and manual searches. After reviewing each country’s regulations on CGRP mAb usage, we summarised the findings across several categories and compared them with reports from Western countries: effectiveness, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures, associated symptoms, patient satisfaction, switching, responder characteristics, and discontinuation. Although effectiveness and safety were comparable, notable differences regarding evidence on switching and responder characteristics were observed, likely attributable to variations in inclusion criteria and study design. Overall, the effectiveness and safety profiles of CGRP mAbs in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are comparable to those reported in Western countries. However, differences in regulatory policies significantly influenced the findings of real-world reports, highlighting the importance of region- and country-specific evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42032384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.