SynthesisClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026
Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Eosinophilic Sialodochitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic sialodochitis is an under-recognized obstructive inflammatory disorder of the major salivary ducts that has been described under heterogeneous terms, including allergic parotitis, fibrinous sialodochitis, and Kussmaul disease. We systematically reviewed the literature to summarize nomenclature, clinical presentation, diagnostic assessment, treatment, and consistency with proposed diagnostic criteria. We searched six bibliographic databases from inception to December 2025, complemented by Google Scholar and citation tracking. Studies describing eosinophilic sialodochitis or related entities were included irrespective of language. Data were synthesized descriptively because of marked heterogeneity. Seventy-nine studies involving 387 patients were included, comprising 64 full-text reports and 15 conference abstracts or posters. Most publications were case reports or case series. Recurrent parotid and/or submandibular swelling, eosinophil-rich salivary mucus plugs, ductal dilatation or stenosis, and frequent atopic comorbidity were the most characteristic findings. Eosinophils were identified in salivary mucus in 53 of 58 studies reporting local samples. Full compliance with published diagnostic criteria varied markedly, from 45 of 79 studies using the Baer framework to 2 of 79 using the Carey framework, while no study fully satisfied the Zhao framework. Treatment was usually multimodal and included antihistamines, corticosteroids, intraductal irrigation, sialendoscopy-assisted procedures, and, in selected refractory cases, biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation. The available evidence supports eosinophilic sialodochitis as a distinct but incompletely standardized clinicopathological entity. Interpretation is limited by heterogeneity, incomplete reporting, and low-certainty evidence. Standardized definitions and minimum reporting items are needed to improve diagnostic certainty and comparability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.