Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032293›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

A phase 2 randomized controlled trial of luvadaxistat in treatment of adults with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: results from the ERUDITE study.

Ni A Khin, Reuben H Fan, Tingting Ge, Hans S Klein, Jacob S Ballon, Satjit Brar, Philip D Harvey, Joshua T Kantrowitz, Richard S E Keefe, Mahnaz Asgharnejad and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05182476 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Luvadaxistat in Subjects With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia, Followed by Open-Label Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05182476 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Luvadaxistat in Subjects With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia, Followed by Open-Label Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeurocrine BiosciencesRan2021 to 2024Enrolled216ConditionsSchizophreniaArmsPlacebo, Luvadaxistat
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ni A KhinNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3224-4728
Reuben H FanNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Tingting GeNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Hans S KleinNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Jacob S BallonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-4847
Satjit BrarNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Philip D HarveyDivision of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-9366
Joshua T KantrowitzNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-7016
Richard S E KeefeDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-8897
Mahnaz AsgharnejadTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Venkatesha MurthyTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eiry RobertsNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Jaskaran B SinghNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. jsingh@neurocrine.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-0994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase 2 ERUDITE (NCT05182476) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of luvadaxistat, a selective ᴅ-amino acid oxidase inhibitor, for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. ERUDITE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in adults with schizophrenia receiving background antipsychotic therapy. Following a 2-week placebo run-in, participants were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, luvadaxistat 20 mg, or luvadaxistat 50 mg once daily for a 12-week treatment period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Day 98 in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) composite score. Safety outcomes included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Overall, 203 participants were randomized (placebo, n = 101; luvadaxistat 20 mg, n = 50; luvadaxistat 50 mg, n = 52), and 178 (87.7%) completed the treatment period. Luvadaxistat did not significantly improve performance (change from baseline) in BACS composite score versus placebo at Day 98 (least-squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 20 mg, -0.7 [-2.8, 1.4], p = 0.75; 50 mg, -0.5 [-2.7, 1.6], p = 0.69). TEAEs were reported in approximately one-third of participants across groups, with comparable rates observed between the luvadaxistat and placebo groups. TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate, and no safety concerns were identified. Luvadaxistat 20 mg or 50 mg did not show statistically significant changes in cognitive performance or functioning within the ERUDITE study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05182476.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBenzamidesCognitive DysfunctionSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsBenzamides

Identifiers

PMID42032293
PMCPMC13598067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.