Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032267›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026

The evolution of eyespots in skates and rays.

Madicken Åkerman, Ana Cristina R Gomes, David Wheatcroft, Niclas Kolm, Karl Gotthard, John L Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The evolution of eyespots in skates and rays.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madicken ÅkermanDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ana Cristina R GomesDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-3248
David WheatcroftDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Niclas KolmDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-336X
Karl GotthardDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-6271
John L FitzpatrickDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. john.fitzpatrick@zoologi.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-4409

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) 2016-0146Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2021-04258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals deploy a wide range of anti-predator adaptations, often combining multiple strategies into a 'defence portfolio'. However, why certain defences evolve together whereas others are mutually exclusive remains unclear. Here we use a phylogenetic approach to examine the evolution of conspicuous visual markings-including eyespots and other conspicuous markings-alongside alternative anti-predator defences in skates and rays (Batoidea), a diverse group of cartilaginous fishes. We compiled data on the presence, type and number of conspicuous markings in 580 species of skates and rays, together with information on robust mechanical and electrical defences (venomous caudal stings and electric organs), adult body size and habitat depth as a proxy for light environment. We show that eyespots evolve stepwise from other conspicuous markings and that evolutionary gains of multiple markings are typically followed by reductions to fewer (often paired) markings. We further find that defence strategies follow alternative evolutionary trajectories: species possessing robust defences rarely evolve eyespots, whereas eyespots are favoured in smaller-bodied species lacking such defences and inhabiting well-lit waters where visual signals are most effective. These results show that accounting for multiple anti-predator defences can resolve why iconic anti-predator defences, such as eyespots, appear in some taxonomic groups but are conspicuously absent in others.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPigmentationSkates, FishAnimalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID42032267
PMCPMC13253327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.