ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management in Pediatric Urologic Surgeries: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively novel regional anesthesia technique that has shown promising results in providing postoperative analgesia for pediatric urologic surgeries. Originally described for thoracic neuropathic pain, the ESP block has since expanded in use related to simplicity, safety, and efficacy across various surgical procedures. RECENT
findingsThis review explores the application of the ESP block in pediatric urology, including technique, dosing, indications, comparative advantages, and current evidence from case reports. Particular attention is given to its role in surgeries such as pyeloplasty, nephrectomy, and ureteral reimplantation, where both somatic and visceral pain must be effectively managed. Ultrasound guidance, the use of long-acting local anesthetics, and consideration of patient-specific factors make this technique especially suited for pediatric patients. While case-based evidence supports the block’s analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing benefits, especially in comparison to traditional neuraxial techniques, limitations remain due to the lack of randomized trials and unclear patterns of anesthetic spread. Further research is needed to standardize practice and confirm the long-term utility of the ESP block in pediatric urologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42032213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.