ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Angiography-free diagnosis of retinal diseases via interpretable multi-modal learning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of retinal diseases often depends on fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA), an invasive imaging modality requiring intravenous dye injection. Although color fundus photography (CFP) offers a safer and more accessible alternative, it lacks the vascular detail necessary for high-precision diagnosis, creating a critical gap in clinical workflows when angiography is unavailable or contraindicated. We introduce an angiography-free, interpretable multi-modal learning framework that enables accurate retinal disease diagnosis using only CFP images at test time. Rather than synthesizing FFA images, our model learns to disentangle shared and modality-specific features from paired CFP and FFA inputs during training. These features are stored in disease-specific libraries that serve as a reference during inference, allowing the model to transparently infer angiographic information from CFP data alone. Extensive internal and external validation on 119,173 retinal images across seven diseases demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy (AUCs of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively), along with clinically aligned visual explanations that support model decisions. By combining non-invasive deployment with transparent reasoning, our framework offers a robust and generalizable alternative to angiography, suitable for real-world implementation in diverse clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.