Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032149›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Regime-based interpretation of groundwater pollution using Gaussian mixture modelling and water pollution index in aquifer systems.

Ali Aldrees, Abdulhayat M Jibrin, Salisu Dan'azumi, Sani I Abba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali AldreesDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulhayat M JibrinCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia. g202303890@kfupm.edu.sa.
Salisu Dan'azumiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Sani I AbbaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, 31952, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2025/R/1447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Index-based groundwater assessment reduces complex hydrochemical data to a single value, but it typically masks underlying chemical differences. This study applies a regime-based framework to groundwater in the Neogene aquifer of Al-Hassa Oasis using 300 samples. Gaussian Mixture Modelling (GMM) was used to identify seven hydrochemical regimes based on change in Bayesian Information Criterion (ΔBIC) selection, while Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to examine structure in reduced space. The results show that Water Pollution Index (WPI) values range from 1.46 to 1.56 across regimes. Although this range is narrow, statistical testing confirms significant differences. Regime-specific analysis reveals distinct associations among iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and arsenic (As), as well as pH-dependent behaviour of vanadium (V) and molybdenum (Mo). Strontium (Sr) increases consistently with Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), indicating salinity-related enrichment. The findings show that similar WPI values can arise from different chemical compositions. This study provides a framework for linking pollution level with hydrochemical structure and supports more targeted groundwater monitoring in arid aquifers.

Indexed as

Aquifer systemsGaussian mixture modellingGroundwater quality assessmentHydrochemical regimesWater pollution index

Identifiers

PMID42032149
PMCPMC13275917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.