Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032134›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effect of stacking sequence on the mechanical behaviour of CARALL and GLARE fiber metal laminates.

Madhusudhan Balkundhi, Satish Shenoy Baloor, Gururaj Bolar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madhusudhan BalkundhiManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Satish Shenoy BaloorManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Gururaj BolarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. gururaj.bolar@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study systematically evaluates and compares the mechanical performance of CARALL_5 fiber metal laminates (FMLs) and GLARE_5 FMLs with two distinct stacking sequences. The mechanical performance was assessed considering the tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact strength of the two FMLs. Under tensile loading conditions, type-2 CARALL_5 FML exhibited a tensile strength of 776 ± 73 MPa, against a tensile strength of 466 ± 39 MPa exhibited by GLARE_5 FML. In comparison, type-1 CARALL FML, with aluminum as the outermost layers exhibited a comparatively lower tensile strength of 610 ± 53 MPa, while exhibiting a stepped failure pattern during tensile loading, indicating gradual progression of damage, and enhanced damage tolerance. The FMLs displayed failure modes such plastic deformation, fiber breakage, matrix cracking, and delamination under tensile loading conditions. The maximum values of flexural strength of around 1092 ± 85 MPa was observed in type-2 CARALL_5 FML, where the carbon fiber layers were on the outermost layers. In comparison, type-2 GLARE_5 FML displayed a 48% flexural strength, due to the lower elastic modulus and stiffness displayed by the glass fibers. Furthermore, type-1 CARALL_5 FML showed an impact energy of 14.2 ± 0.59 J, which was 98% greater than the impact energy of type-1 GLARE_5 FML. The observed failure modes were plastic deformation, fiber-matrix debonding, matrix cracking, and delamination. Based on these findings, type-1 CARALL_5 FMLs are ideal for applications involving tensile and impact loads, where it is crucial to retain load-bearing capacity even after sustaining damage. In contrast, type-2 CARALL_5 FML is more appropriate where the ability to endure bi-axial loading is essential.

Indexed as

Composite manufacturingFiber metal laminatesHybrid structural materialsLightweight materialsMaterials characterization

Identifiers

PMID42032134
PMCPMC13273083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.