ArticleScientific reports2026
High-throughput olive germplasm classification using morphological phenotyping and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a robust framework for high-throughput olive germplasm classification, addressing the phenotyping bottleneck that currently limits breeding programs. Unlike prior research restricted to narrow genotypic ranges or single-image modalities, we analyzed 65 genetically diverse olive cultivars from the Tarom Olive Research Station (Zanjan, Iran). We employed a dual-image phenotyping approach, integrating high-resolution imagery of both fruits and kernels with quantitative weight metrics. This methodology enabled the extraction of critical morphological traits—including eccentricity, solidity, and shape factors—to train and validate seven Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Our comparative analysis of Discriminant Analysis (DA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and ensemble methods reveals that the DA model achieves superior performance, attaining a recall and precision of 0.98 when integrating fruit, kernel, and weight data. This significantly outperforms standard models like KNN and Naive Bayes in this domain. These findings demonstrate that combining multi-view imaging with morphological feature extraction provides a highly accurate, cost-effective tool for managing olive genetic resources and accelerating crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.