Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032083›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

AI-assisted assessment of bowel preparation from patient-generated images for pre-procedure triage.

Ye-Chan Kim, Hilal Hwang, Jong-Bub Lee, Seon-Min Lee, Si-Yeon Lee, Jin Wook Yi, Hyun-Gyu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ye-Chan Kim *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hilal Hwang *Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Bub LeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Seon-Min LeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Si-Yeon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Wook YiThyroid Cancer Center, AIN Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea. jinwook.yi.md@gmail.com.
Hyun-Gyu LeeCollege of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea. hglee@inha.ac.kr.

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation RS-2022-II220641National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2026-25473885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy or colorectal surgery can delay procedures, require repeat preparation, and increase clinical workload. Current assessment depends on manual review of patient-reported rectal effluent images by nursing staff, which is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variation. To develop and explore the feasibility of an AI-assisted pre-procedure triage model that classifies bowel-preparation adequacy from patient-generated toilet images to support pre-colonoscopy assessment. A total of 1,508 patient-generated toilet images were retrospectively collected from colorectal surgery patients at a tertiary hospital (Aug 2019–Feb 2023). To avoid within-patient correlation, we retained one image per patient, excluding 490 images from patients with multiple submissions, resulting in 1,018 images from 1,018 unique patients. Three raters (resident, faculty surgeon, graduate student) independently labeled each image; disagreements were resolved by a two-of-three consensus rule. A DenseNet-201 model incorporating a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) for multi-scale feature representation was trained to classify bowel preparation as clean or not clean. Model performance was assessed using stratified five-fold cross-validation on a development set (n = 778) and a held-out test set drawn from high-confidence, three-rater consensus cases (n = 240), using clinically relevant metrics including AUROC, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity. The model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.886, F1-score of 0.882, and sensitivity of 0.931 for detecting inadequate preparation (10 repeated five-fold cross-validation; development set, n = 778). Grad-CAM visualization showed attention focused on residual stool and water turbidity, consistent with clinician interpretation. Ablation analysis indicated incremental improvements from random oversampling, smoothing weight decay, and FPN integration. The AI-assisted bowel-preparation triage model showed robust discrimination of inadequate preparation using real-world patient images. This approach has the potential to streamline manual review and enhance efficiency in pre-procedure assessment. Further studies should validate the model prospectively and evaluate its integration into clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCatharticsColonoscopyPreoperative CareTriageAgedColorectal Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCathartics

Identifiers

PMID42032083
PMCPMC13280243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.