ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational modeling of vehicle-bridge interaction with experimental validation under moving loads for structural health monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates vehicle–bridge interaction under moving loads, with a focus on reduced-order modeling strategies applicable to structural health monitoring (SHM). Two computational approaches with increasing kinematic fidelity are developed and analyzed: a classical Euler–Bernoulli beam model and a slab-based Kirchhoff–Love plate formulation. Both models are coupled with multibody vehicle dynamics to predict bridge response under realistic traffic conditions.The beam model captures the dominant longitudinal bending response, whereas the slab formulation additionally resolves transverse deformation and bending–torsion coupling induced by lane-dependent vehicle excitation. Numerical predictions are validated against in situ measurements obtained from a reinforced concrete slab bridge instrumented with displacement and acceleration sensors, providing spatially resolved response data under operational moving load.Results show that the beam model accurately reproduces the global quasi-static response, while the slab model captures additional transverse and torsional effects that are not accessible to planar formulations. After model updating, the slab-based representation achieves close agreement with measured responses across a range of vehicle speeds and transverse load positions. The study demonstrates that slab-based reduced-order models provide a computationally efficient and mechanically consistent intermediate alternative between beam formulations and full three-dimensional finite element models. The proposed approach is particularly suitable for SHM applications, including model updating, inverse load identification and condition assessment under moving loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.