Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

From rows to yields: how foundation models for tabular data simplify crop yield prediction.

Filip Sabo, Michele Meroni, María Piles, Martin Claverie, Fanie Ferreira, Elna Van Den Berg, Francesco Collivignarelli, Felix Rembold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Filip SaboEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. filip.szabo@ec.europa.eu.
Michele MeroniSeidor Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.
María PilesImage Processing Laboratory, Universitat de València, València, Spain.
Martin ClaverieEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Fanie FerreiraGeoTerraImage (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, South Africa.
Elna Van Den BergGeoTerraImage (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, South Africa.
Francesco CollivignarelliEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Felix RemboldEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and timely crop yield forecasts are crucial for guiding decisions on resource allocation, market strategies, and food security interventions, especially in food-insecure regions. These forecasts enable policymakers and stakeholders in the global food supply chain to anticipate production levels and implement effective mitigation and response measures. As the complexity of data and the need for precise predictions continue to grow, there is an increasing demand for models that can efficiently process and analyze diverse datasets. To address these challenges, we present an application of a foundation model for small- to medium-sized tabular data (TabPFN), to sub-national yield forecasting task in South Africa for maize, soybeans and sunflowers. We used the dekadal (10-day) time series of Earth Observation (EO; FAPAR and soil moisture) and gridded weather data (air temperature, precipitation and radiation) to forecast the yield of summer crops at the sub-national level. The crop yield data were available for 23 years and for up to 8 provinces. Covariate variables for TabPFN (i.e., EO and weather) were extracted by region and aggregated at a monthly scale. We benchmarked the results of the TabPFN against six ML models and two baseline models. Leave-one-year-out cross-validation experiment setting was used in order to ensure the assessment of the model’s capacity to forecast an unseen year. Results showed that TabPFN and ML models exhibit comparable accuracy, both outperforming the baseline approaches. For maize, the best-performing ML model achieved 6.8% rRMSEp, while TabPFN achieved 8.8%, with R² of 0.91 and 0.86 respectively at the national level. Nonetheless, TabPFN demonstrated practical utility due to its faster tuning time and reduced requirement for feature engineering.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalForecastingGlycine maxModels, TheoreticalPrediction AlgorithmsSouth AfricaWeatherZea mays

Identifiers

PMID42032044
PMCPMC13276254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.