ArticleScientific reports2026
From rows to yields: how foundation models for tabular data simplify crop yield prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sequential Soybean Phenotypes for Grain Yield Prediction in Reciprocal Two-Season Validation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and timely crop yield forecasts are crucial for guiding decisions on resource allocation, market strategies, and food security interventions, especially in food-insecure regions. These forecasts enable policymakers and stakeholders in the global food supply chain to anticipate production levels and implement effective mitigation and response measures. As the complexity of data and the need for precise predictions continue to grow, there is an increasing demand for models that can efficiently process and analyze diverse datasets. To address these challenges, we present an application of a foundation model for small- to medium-sized tabular data (TabPFN), to sub-national yield forecasting task in South Africa for maize, soybeans and sunflowers. We used the dekadal (10-day) time series of Earth Observation (EO; FAPAR and soil moisture) and gridded weather data (air temperature, precipitation and radiation) to forecast the yield of summer crops at the sub-national level. The crop yield data were available for 23 years and for up to 8 provinces. Covariate variables for TabPFN (i.e., EO and weather) were extracted by region and aggregated at a monthly scale. We benchmarked the results of the TabPFN against six ML models and two baseline models. Leave-one-year-out cross-validation experiment setting was used in order to ensure the assessment of the model’s capacity to forecast an unseen year. Results showed that TabPFN and ML models exhibit comparable accuracy, both outperforming the baseline approaches. For maize, the best-performing ML model achieved 6.8% rRMSEp, while TabPFN achieved 8.8%, with R² of 0.91 and 0.86 respectively at the national level. Nonetheless, TabPFN demonstrated practical utility due to its faster tuning time and reduced requirement for feature engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.