ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a predictive model for maternal satisfaction with epidural analgesia based on perinatal complications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maternal satisfaction with labor epidural analgesia is a clinically relevant patient-centered outcome influenced by analgesic efficacy, the care process, and perinatal complications. This retrospective cohort study analyzed de-identified clinical records and routinely collected postpartum satisfaction assessments from 2221 parturients who received labor epidural analgesia at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital between July 2023 and March 2024. The cohort was randomly divided into training (n = 1555) and internal validation (n = 666) sets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, followed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression, was used to construct a nomogram predicting maternal dissatisfaction. Fever, nausea and vomiting, puncture pain, lumbar soreness, and lower limb motor impairment were independent predictors of dissatisfaction. The model showed good discrimination in the training set (AUC 0.789, 95% CI 0.764-0.814) and validation set (AUC 0.764, 95% CI 0.720-0.809), with satisfactory calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.