Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032024›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Analysis and comparison of two selected machine learning algorithms for enhancing wireless sensor network protocols.

Abdulla Juwaied, Lidia Jackowska-Strumillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdulla JuwaiedInstitute of Applied Computer Science, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland. Abdulla.juwaied@p.lodz.pl.
Lidia Jackowska-StrumilloInstitute of Applied Computer Science, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

Politechnika Lódzka 501/2-24-1-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) consist of low-power, battery-powered sensor nodes that collaborate to monitor the environment and transmit data to a base station. However, their efficiency is mainly constrained by energy usage and limited network lifespan. Among cluster‑based routing protocols, the Deterministic Energy‑Efficient Clustering (DEC) protocol is a recognised hierarchical scheme for heterogeneous WSNs; however, DEC still faces several challenges, particularly with energy consumption. This paper presents a unified comparative study of two machine learning-enhanced modifications to the DEC protocol for WSNs. Unlike our previous protocol proposals, this work integrates DEC-KNN (K-Nearest Neighbours) and DEC-KM (K-Means) within a single simulation framework, systematically compares their energy, distance, and stability performance, and provides practical deployment guidelines based on application-specific trade-offs. The simulations are conducted through MATLAB R2024b simulations on a 50-node heterogeneous WSN covering a 100 m × 100 m area. Both protocols show a substantial benefit over the original protocol baseline. DEC-KM leads to a small reduction in both total and average energy consumption and provides a good balance between clustering performance and energy consumption, making it an attractive option for energy-limited WSN applications in Internet of Things (IoT) and smart environments.

Indexed as

Deterministic Energy-Efficient Clustering (DEC)Energy efficiencyK-MeansK-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)Network lifetimeWireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)

Identifiers

PMID42032024
PMCPMC13279827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.