ArticleScientific reports2026
A time series based dynamic prediction model for loess mudstone landslides.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study targets the poor dynamic adaptability of traditional prediction models for loess mudstone landslides, their neglect of time‑series patterns, and weak noise handling. Using the Zhangjiawan landslide as a case study, we propose a dynamic prediction model for loess mudstone landslides based on time‑series analysis. The model employs VMD to adaptively decompose the GNSS‑monitored cumulative displacement sequence into three physically meaningful components—trend, periodic and random. This decomposition reveals complex features caused by geological structures, rainfall, freeze–thaw cycles, and other factors. We design special prediction strategies for each component: the trend component is predicted using a sliding‑window improved quadratic least‑squares method that removes early data influence and improves responsiveness to deformation trends; the periodic component is further decomposed with the CEEMDAN–K‑means–VMD method and then predicted using an SSA‑Transformer‑BiLSTM model with rainfall and freeze–thaw factors; the random component is tested for white noise, and non‑white sequences are predicted using an SSR‑LSTM model based on historical deformation data. Applications show that VMD reduces data complexity, and the combined predictions agree well with measured values (MAE = 1.98, MAPE = 0.88%, R² = 0.93). The model improves the prediction accuracy and applicability for loess mudstone landslides and provides a reference for dynamic forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.