ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-world platinum selection in immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: an exploratory multi-institutional retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Weight loss despite nutritional support predicts poor outcomes after postoperative chemoradiotherapy for high-risk head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The KEYNOTE-048 trial established pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the standard first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). In the present study, the efficacy and safety of cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with pembrolizumab were compared using real-world data. In this retrospective study, 76 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab plus 5-FU and either cisplatin (n = 41) or carboplatin (n = 35) were analysed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 haematological and grade ≥ 2 non-haematological adverse events. The median PFS was 4.1 months with cisplatin and 7.1 months with carboplatin (p = 0.58). The median OS values were 14.8 and 20.7 months, respectively (p = 0.88). The ORR values were similar (34.1% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.99). Grade ≥ 3 haematological adverse events were more frequent with cisplatin than with carboplatin (87.8% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.01), as were grade ≥ 2 non-haematological adverse events (97.6% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.01). Cisplatin did not demonstrate a significant advantage over carboplatin in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR, but was associated with higher toxicity pembrolizumab-based therapy for R/M HNSCC. These findings suggest that carboplatin may represent a reasonable alternative in combination with pembrolizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.