ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatial preferences and characteristics of physical activity areas among senior citizens in urban community parks of Nanchang, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With an ageing population, promoting physical activity in community parks is crucial for healthy urban living. This study examines the spatial preferences and environmental determinants of physical activity among senior citizens in four high-density community parks in Nanchang, China. Using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities, 32 full-day observations were conducted across 121 micro-spatial units. Global Moran’s I tests confirmed that sedentary behaviour exhibited significant spatial clustering (I = 0.137, Z = 2.65, p < 0.01), while moderate-to-vigorous physical activity followed a random distribution pattern. Principal Component Analysis and hierarchical clustering identified 14 distinct spatial typologies. Stepwise multiple linear regression models revealed that: (1) sedentary behaviour is decisively and solely driven by the provision of rest facilities (PC4, β = 0.310, p = 0.001), outweighing landscape aesthetics or spatial enclosure; and (2) no significant environmental predictors were identified for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, suggesting it is more influenced by social organisation than micro-environmental features. These findings offer a fine-grained spatial diagnostic framework, advocating for a "functionality-first" design strategy. The study suggests that precision placement of rest nodes, rather than general landscape enhancement, is critical for supporting the stationary engagement and diverse behavioural rhythms (e.g., stationary socialisers, casual movers and vigorous participants) of ageing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.