ArticleScientific reports2026
Genotoxic potential of Dianthus superbus var. superbus and Petasites paradoxus (Retz.) Baumg. methanolic extracts in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dianthus superbus var. superbus (D. superbus) and Petasites paradoxus (Retz.) Baumg. (P. paradoxus) are traditionally used medicinal plants from the Italian flora. This study presents the first investigation into the cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of methanolic leaf extracts from both species. Genotoxicity was assessed using the automated cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO-K1) cells. Both extracts exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxic effects, with IC50 values of 27 µg/mL for D. superbus and 56 µg/mL for P. paradoxus. At the lowest tested concentration (6.3 µg/mL), D. superbus extract did not significantly affect micronucleus frequency in the presence or absence of mitomycin C (MMC). However, at the highest concentration (25 µg/mL), D. superbus extract significantly increased micronucleus frequency under both conditions compared to control cells. For P. paradoxus, the lowest concentration tested (12.5 µg/mL) did not alter micronucleus frequency in the absence of MMC, but notably reduced micronucleus formation when co-administered with MMC, suggesting potential antigenotoxic activity. Conversely, the highest concentration of P. paradoxus extract (50 µg/mL) induced a significant increase in micronucleus frequency compared to MMC treatment alone. These results indicate that both extracts possess cytotoxic and genotoxic properties. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying these genotoxic effects and identifying the specific phytochemicals responsible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.