Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031978›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

A review of the application of digital phenotyping in predicting peripartum depressive symptoms.

Boglarka Z Kovacs, Sascha Schweitzer, Fotios C Papadopoulos, Annette Bauer, Alkistis Skalkidou, Hsing-Fen Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boglarka Z Kovacs *Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sascha Schweitzer *ESB Business School, Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Germany.
Fotios C PapadopoulosDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Annette BauerCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Alkistis SkalkidouDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hsing-Fen TuDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. hsing-fen.tu@umu.se.

Funding

Parent-Infant Research Institute STePPS CRE 2024Swedish Brain Foundation FO2021-0161, FO2022-0098Swedish Research Council 2020-01965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripartum depression (PPD) affects ~12-25% of pregnant and postpartum women worldwide, yet routine screening often fails to capture real-time symptom changes. Digital phenotyping (DP), using data from digital devices such as text entries, sleep tracking, physical activity, social media behavior, and ecological momentary assessments, has been proposed as a complementary approach to support the prediction and early identification for PPD. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023461325) examined 14 studies published between 2014 and March 2025 that explored passive and active DP data across the antenatal and postnatal periods. Most studies employed observational designs and used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as the primary outcome. Passive DP data related to sleep and circadian rhythms were frequently associated with depressive symptoms, whereas findings for physical activity were inconsistent. Active DP data, including language features from text entries, mood logs, semi-random ecological momentary assessments, and social media behavior, were often reported as informative, particularly when combined with personal history or self-reported measures. However, considerable variation across study designs, data sources, analytical approaches, and validation strategies limits direct comparison of findings and prevents causal interpretation. Overall, the evidence remains largely exploratory, and findings should be interpreted cautiously pending more rigorous validation.

Identifiers

PMID42031978
PMCPMC13109372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.