ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated estimation of drain output in postoperative patients using deep learning on clinical images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative drains are essential components of care in general surgery and intensive care units, where accurate monitoring of drain output is critical for detecting complications such as hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, or infection. Despite its importance, output measurement is still performed manually, which is time-consuming, exposes staff to biohazardous fluids, and is prone to documentation errors. In this study, we present a deep learning based automated system for estimating postoperative drain output from clinical images of Jackson-Pratt drains and drainage bags collected under real hospital conditions. The dataset includes a wide range of effluents, such as blood, gastric content, and serous fluid, representing the visual variability encountered in daily clinical practice. The proposed pipeline combines object detection and semantic segmentation to localize drains and mark out fluid boundaries, enabling precise and contact-free volume estimation of the fluids inside the drainage bags. Our system achieved high segmentation accuracy, with Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of approximately 0.99 and clinically acceptable mean absolute errors (5.1 mL for Jackson-Pratt drains and 43.6 mL for drainage bags). Robustness analyses demonstrated consistent performance across varying lighting conditions and viewing angles commonly encountered at the bedside. This work introduces a novel approach for automated drain output measurement validated on real patient data. By reducing staff workload and minimizing exposure to potentially infectious fluids, our system has the potential to improve both patient safety and occupational safety in surgical and intensive care unit (ICU) workflows, and also supports early detection of postoperative complications in surgical and intensive care settings. Our data and code are available at https://zenodo.org/records/17599824 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.