ArticleScientific reports2026
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting stroke in patients with hypertension: insights from the SPRINT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with hypertension being its most significant risk factor. However, few studies have specifically developed predictive models for stroke risk in hypertensive patients with elevated cardiovascular risk. This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable predictive model based on machine learning (ML) methods to assess stroke risk in hypertensive patients, enabling early prevention and improved prognosis. This study is a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Key clinical variables were identified by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and predictive models were constructed using six machine learning (ML) algorithms. The predictive performance of the models was compared using multiple evaluation metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the results were interpreted using SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). A total of 264 participants were selected from the SPRINT dataset using random under-sampling. LASSO regression identified 14 key variables, which were used to develop six ML models. The logistic regression (LR) model was the most effective, with an AUC of 0.810. SHAP analysis indicated that gender, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), serum creatinine, and race were the most influential factors for stroke risk, with female and higher age, SBP, and serum creatinine levels associated with an increased risk of stroke. An interpretable ML model was developed and validated to predict stroke risk in patients with hypertension and elevated cardiovascular risk, identifying gender, age, and SBP as key contributors. This tool may facilitate individualized risk assessment and support targeted prevention strategies in hypertensive patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.