ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust oriented object detection for posterior teeth in mixed dentition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mixed dentition stage presents significant diagnostic challenges in panoramic radiography due to the high structural density and spatial superposition of primary roots and developing permanent germs. Traditional horizontal bounding box (HBB) detection methods suffer from a “geometric mismatch,” failing to accurately localize tilted teeth in crowded dentitions. This study aims to develop and validate a high-precision oriented object detection (OBB) framework to resolve these localization ambiguities. A retrospective dual-center study was conducted utilizing 1,148 panoramic radiographs. A specialized dataset annotating primary molars, developing premolars, and first permanent molars was constructed. The YOLOv11-OBB architecture was trained on a primary cohort (n = 1,040). Model performance was evaluated on an internal test set (n = 104) and an independent external validation cohort (n = 108) to assess generalizability. The YOLOv11-OBB-Large model achieved exceptional performance, yielding a Mean Average Precision (mAP@50–95) of 0.904 on the internal dataset and maintaining robust accuracy (mAP@50–95 = 0.896) on the external dataset. The Nano model demonstrated a superior efficiency-accuracy trade-off, achieving an inference latency of 141ms on a standard CPU (vs. 958ms for Large) with minimal performance loss (mAP@50–95 = 0.879). In the stratified analysis by tooth position, the model exhibited consistent reliability across both permanent and primary dentitions. Mandibular premolars and molars achieved the highest precision (mAP@50–95 > 0.94), while primary molars maintained robust detection rates (mAP@50–95 > 0.86) despite the complexities of root resorption and germ overlap. The proposed OBB framework effectively addresses the geometric limitations of traditional detectors, providing precise localization and rotation information essential for downstream tasks such as automated space analysis and eruption monitoring. The model demonstrates strong generalizability across different clinical centers. To foster reproducibility and facilitate future research, the source code and pre-trained weights are publicly available at https://github.com/Zheng-Yunhao/Mixed-Dentition-OBB-Detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.