ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep neural network model for fractional-order cancer chemotherapy dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a novel hybrid computational framework for a fractional-order cancer chemotherapy model based on Caputo reaction–diffusion equations. Its main novelty is the coupling of a high-fidelity fractional Adams–Bashforth–Moulton (ABM) predictor–corrector solver with a carefully designed hyperbolic tangent sigmoid deep neural network (HTS–DNN) adapted to nonlocal, memory-dependent tumor–immune–drug dynamics. Unlike standard feed-forward networks using ReLU-type activations, the proposed model employs four hidden layers with (50, 30, 20, 10) neurons, smooth HTS activations, and Levenberg–Marquardt optimization, providing an efficient approximation framework for hereditary fractional trajectories. High-fidelity data generated by the ABM solver are used to train the HTS–DNN with an 80%/10%/10% train/validation/test split. For several fractional orders and initial conditions, the model accurately reproduces the numerical solutions, achieving mean squared errors below [Formula: see text] and uniformly small time-dependent errors. It also provides more than five orders of magnitude reduction in prediction time compared with direct fractional simulation, while preserving key biological features such as memory-driven tumor suppression, delayed immune activation, and concentration-dependent drug effects. These results show that the proposed ABM–HTS–DNN framework is an accurate, robust, and computationally efficient surrogate for fractional cancer chemotherapy dynamics, enabling rapid exploration of therapy schedules and parameter regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.