Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031934›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Generating explainable hypotheses for drug repurposing with graph neural networks.

Pablo Perdomo-Quinteiro, Emre Guney, Alberto Belmonte-Hernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo Perdomo-QuinteiroSSR Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain. p.perdomo@upm.es.
Emre GuneySTALICLA, Discovery and Data Science Unit, Barcelona, 08039, Spain.
Alberto Belmonte-HernándezSSR Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Health 101057619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical knowledge discovery increasingly relies on computational tools to uncover patterns in complex datasets, yet generating explainable, evidence-based hypotheses about biological interactions remains challenging. This study introduces XAIPath, an interpretable pipeline that leverages biomedical knowledge graphs and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to uncover and explain novel drug-disease relationships, aiding applications such as drug repurposing. The pipeline combines GNN-based predictions with a post-hoc interpretability layer that extracts simple paths connecting drug and disease nodes in a biomedical knowledge graph and compares them using MinHash-based similarity. Similar paths are grouped via K-means clustering to build interpretable clusters that represent alternative mechanistic hypotheses. The method was applied to the NeDRex knowledge graph for drug indication prediction, with performance evaluated using AUROC, AUPRC, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. XAIPath achieved strong predictive performance, with AUROC exceeding 95% and AUPRC over 90% across training, validation, and test sets, while precision, sensitivity, and specificity all surpassed 85%. Most high-scoring predictions were supported by existing literature, and the extracted path clusters closely aligned with DrugMechDB annotations, supporting the plausibility of the generated hypotheses. Overall, XAIPath offers a scalable and explainable approach for identifying drug-disease associations, facilitating hypothesis generation and biological validation, and highlighting the value of explainable AI in biomedical research and drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug RepositioningGraph Neural NetworksCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42031934
PMCPMC13272636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.