Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hydronephrosis modifies the association between ureteroscopy and intravesical recurrence risk after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Takeshi Sano, Junichi Ikeda, Takashi Yoshida, Takahiro Nakamoto, Yusuke Motoki, Ryuichi Yoshida, Toshifumi Takahashi, Yuto Hattori, Toshinari Yamasaki, Masaaki Imamura and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Takeshi SanoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Junichi IkedaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Takashi YoshidaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Takahiro NakamotoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Yusuke MotokiDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Ryuichi YoshidaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Toshifumi TakahashiDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuto HattoriDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Toshinari YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Masaaki ImamuraDepartment of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Go KoboriDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Jun WatanabeThe Department of Urology, Toyooka Hospital, Toyooka, Japan.
Noriyuki ItoDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Toshiya AkaoDepartment of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shotaro HatanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeki KoterazawaDepartment of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro FukuiThe Department of Urology, Toyooka Hospital, Toyooka, Japan.
Kaoru MurakamiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki SumiyoshiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki KitaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan.
Kimihiko MasuiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki GotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidefumi KinoshitaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Toru KannoThe Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507, Kyoto, Japan. selecao@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-2816
Ryoichi SaitoDepartment of Urology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Hyogo, Japan. rsaito@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3163-8723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates whether ureteroscopy (URS) increases intravesical recurrence (IVR) risk following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and identifies vulnerable patient subgroups. Previous studies did not fully clarify the impact of URS and biopsy on IVR risk, or whether the risk is elevated in specific subgroups. We retrospectively analyzed 1,483 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nine institutions between January 2001 and April 2024. Cox proportional hazards models identified risk factors for IVR. Subgroup analyses determined characteristics increasing recurrence susceptibility. Inverse probability of treatment weighting validated subgroup analyses results. The median follow-up period was 45.1 (IQR 21.1–79.4) months. Multivariable analysis revealed that male sex, lower clinical T stage, concomitant bladder cancer, and pathological node-negative status were significantly associated with shorter IVR-free survival and confirmed URS as an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10–1.53, P < 0.001). URS-associated recurrence risk varied most by the presence of hydronephrosis. In weight-adjusted cohorts, IVR-free survival was significantly shorter with URS compared to non-URS among patients without hydronephrosis (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.35–2.21, P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed among patients with hydronephrosis (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.88–1.40, P = 0.4). URS was an independent risk factor for IVR, but was not associated with increased risk among patients with hydronephrosis, whereas significantly increased risk was observed in patients without hydronephrosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellHydronephrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNephroureterectomyUreteral NeoplasmsUreteroscopyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsHydronephrosisNephroureterectomyRecurrenceUreteroscopyUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42031924
PMCPMC13272906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.