ArticleScientific reports2026
Consistent nonlinear optical refractive index [Formula: see text] measurement of porcine crystalline lens and its surrounding in the 650-900 nm range.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nonlinear optical properties of transparent ocular media have been shown to alter the focused intensity distribution of femtosecond laser pulses, potentially affecting the precision of laser ophthalmic surgery. In this study, the nonlinear refractive index [Formula: see text] of porcine aqueous humor, crystalline lens and vitreous humor was measured using two complementary techniques: the standard Z-scan-derived D4σ method and the phase-object imaging method. Both were performed with a tunable femtosecond laser source across the visible to near-infrared range (650-900 nm). All measured [Formula: see text] values were found to be close to [Formula: see text] within experimental uncertainties, with no measurable nonlinear absorption detected. Notably, the phase-object technique proved particularly well-suited for slightly scattering or heterogeneous media, such as the freshly extracted crystalline lens, when calibrated against a reference medium (here, water). These experimental results allow for a quantitative numerical assessment of pulse and beam degradation due to nonlinear refraction during procedures like cataract surgery, as well as an evaluation of its potential impact on photodisruption geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.