ArticleScientific reports2026
Hemodynamic effect of coil packing density after tubridge flow diverter for anterior circulation small and medium-sized aneurysms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Investigating the impact of coil embolization rate on hemodynamic parameters within the aneurysm sac after treating anterior circulation small and medium-sized aneurysms with the Tubridge (TB) flow diverter. Twenty-six patients with 29 intracranial aneurysms were collected between September 2020 and December 2022. The finite element method simulated preoperative conditions, after TB deployment alone, and with TB plus different coil embolization rates. Different hemodynamic parameters were analyzed under these treatment scenarios. Variance analysis and multiple comparisons were conducted to find an appropriate embolization rate. Twenty-nine aneurysms from 26 patients showed, with increasing TB deployment and coil embolization rates, a continuous improvement in the aneurysm sac's Qinflow, Va, WSS, and normalized and ratio residual blood volume (nRFV and rRFV) under different thresholds (0.1 m/s, 0.15 m/s). Quantitative analysis indicated the impact on hemodynamics was not significant (P > 0.05) when the coil embolization rate reached 5% and beyond for Qinflow, Va, WSS, and RFV under different thresholds (0.1 m/s, 0.15 m/s). Adjunctive embolization can improve the hemodynamic environment within the small and medium-sized aneurysm sac when using the Tubridge flow diverter. However, once the embolization rate within the sac reaches 5%, the hemodynamic environment tends to stabilize, making dense embolization unnecessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.