ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental and simulation orthogonal ghost imaging for measurement-domain optical steganography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an experimentally validated measurement-domain steganography framework based on orthogonal ghost imaging (OGI). In the proposed scheme, a compact single-pixel OGI front-end with orthogonal illumination patterns generates the cover measurements, while a hash-initialized logistic map drives a chaotic keystream that is embedded in the least significant bits (LSBs) of the bucket intensities. This integration into a single optical-digital pipeline avoids holographic components, deep-learning-based reconstruction, and multi-channel architectures, and keeps both the hardware and computational complexity moderate enough for resource-constrained optical platforms. A combination of numerical simulations and single-pixel optical experiments shows that the framework supports imperceptible embedding with stable statistical behaviour. Under the reported operating conditions, the stego ghost images retain PSNR values above 50 dB, SSIM exceeding 0.996, and NPCR close to 99.98%, while intensity histograms, pixel correlations, higher-order moments, and chi-square statistics of the LSB plane remain almost unchanged. These results indicate that chaos-encrypted, bucket-domain LSB modulation can be effectively hidden within the speckle-like statistics and correlation-based reconstruction of OGI, allowing reliable message recovery without visible artifacts while exhibiting statistical consistency with basic steganalysis tests in the OGI domain. Overall, the proposed approach provides a proof-of-concept route to measurement-domain information hiding with hardware-generated covers. Owing to the use of a compact single-pixel architecture and lightweight digital processing, the framework suggests potential relevance to optical scenarios in which system complexity and processing resources are constrained. These considerations are based on architectural simplicity rather than measured power, volume, or embedded runtime metrics. A full system-level implementation and experimental validation on specific embedded or mobile platforms remain beyond the scope of this work and are left for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.