ArticleScientific reports2026
National scale estimation of above-ground biomass density in Nepal's forests at 30 m resolution (circa 2015).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate estimates of forest Above-Ground Biomass Density (AGBD) are pivotal for quantifying carbon stocks and guiding climate mitigation. However, existing global and national products often lack the accuracy and spatial detail required for mountainous, heterogeneous landscapes such as Nepal. This study provides Nepal’s national AGBD baseline for circa 2015 at 30 m resolution. We integrated 965 plot-based AGBD observations with 10 topographic and spectral predictors derived from a digital elevation model, Landsat-8, and ALOS-PALSAR. After removing outliers, we trained a decision tree algorithm, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and assessed its performance using 5-fold cross-validation. The results were promising, with an R² of 0.88, RMSE of 40.93 Mg ha⁻¹, and MAE of 27.24 Mg ha⁻¹. The resulting map reveals marked spatial variability, with higher biomass in southern and central forests, a maximum of 524.67 Mg ha⁻¹, a mean of 173.13 Mg ha⁻¹, and a standard deviation of 112.48 Mg ha⁻¹. The total AGB across Nepal is 1.335 × 1010 Mg (13.35 Pg). An uncertainty surface, derived from cross-validation residuals, highlights elevated prediction variability in rugged mountain regions. This open, rigorously validated baseline supports transparent carbon accounting, REDD+ measurement, reporting, and verification, and forest management. The data products can be accessed at https://zenodo.org/records/17493215.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.