ArticleScientific reports2026
Establishment of multiple predictive models for early identification of the dengue cases in outpatient healthcare systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dengue affected countries have responded with many surveillance strategies to detect outbreaks early. However, the early identification for the individual case before a confirmed dengue diagnosis is still lacking, limiting the effectiveness of early intervention strategies. This case-control study involved 206 dengue cases and 824 controls, which selected from patients who visited outpatient clinics at any medical institutions affiliated to the Futian District of Shenzhen city, China from January 1, 2018 to December 15, 2024. All medical visit information was obtained from the "Futian District Population Health Information Platform". Multiple predictive models for early identification of the dengue cases were established based on the logistic regression analyses. C-index was used to evaluate the accuracy. 1030 study subjects were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, three separate multivariable early case identification models were constructed across diverse data availability scenarios. Model 1 incorporated symptom descriptions with a C-index of 0.793. Model 2 incorporated symptom descriptions and epidemiological exposure factors (C-index: 0.844). Model 3 incorporated symptom descriptions and complete blood count parameters (C-index: 0.973). In the validation set, the C-index of the three models were 0.779, 0.867 and 0.957, respectively. Based on Chinese outpatient diagnostic data, this study established early identification models for dengue cases with high predictive accuracy. These models can be integrated into clinical decision support systems to alert high-risk patients and enable self-assessment tools for community members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.