ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable YOLO architectures for egg size measurement and classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The poultry industry faces growing demands for automated, high-precision egg grading systems to ensure quality control and meet market standards. Traditional methods relying on manual inspection are time-consuming, subjective, and prone to human error. Although state-of-the-art YOLO architectures have achieved high accuracy in object detection, their limited interpretability constrains adoption in agricultural contexts where transparency and biological relevance are critical. This study presents an interpretable deep learning framework based on YOLOv12 architecture for real-time egg size detection and classification. Using a dataset of 844 egg images, the performance of YOLO models (v7–v12) is compared, with YOLOv12-X achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 99.4%. To enhance transparency in automated decision-making, Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, including Grad-CAM and EigenCAM, are integrated to visualize the model’s focus regions during classification. This approach not only validates the model’s alignment with biologically relevant features, such as egg contours, but also provides actionable insights for stakeholders in agriculture and food processing. This work bridges the gap between high-accuracy detection and interpretability, paving the way for smarter, more trustworthy automation in the poultry supply chain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.