ArticleScientific reports2026
LSTM-driven chaotic keystream generator for robust medical image encryption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image transmission and storage must be secure due to the rapid growth of digital healthcare systems and telemedicine. Medical images have high data volumes and strong pixel correlations, making conventional encryption algorithms inefficient or computationally expensive. Chaos-based encryption methods are popular due to their sensitivity to initial conditions and strong randomness, but finite precision limits key spaces and short periodicity in chaotic maps. A novel hybrid image encryption scheme is proposed that integrates long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with classical chaotic maps to generate adaptive keystreams using a hash float-seeded chaotic map and statistical features. The chaotic maps provide nonlinearity and high key sensitivity, while the LSTM extends the randomness, eliminates periodicity, and expands the key space to test its robustness. Three variants of the proposed model were experimented with: LSTM + Logistic, LSTM + sine map, and LSTM + Chebyshev map. Results demonstrate that all 3 models achieve strong encryption performance, but LSTM + Logistic map outperforms the other two in terms of randomness quality, noise, and crop attacks. The proposed model achieves 99.62% of NPCR, 39.59% of UACI, and 7.975 of entropy. Compared with conventional chaos methods and GAN encryption schemes, the proposed method provides high security, lightweight computation, and practical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.