Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Analyzing digital consumer insights through RoBERTa LLM based sentiment analysis and topic modeling.

Qi Shasha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Qi ShashaSchool of Economics and Management, Shaanxi Fashion Engineering University, Xi'an, 712046, Shaanxi, China. 18729806560@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding consumer behavior in the context of online shopping is critical for businesses to adapt to evolving market trends. Customer reviews serve as a rich source of information reflecting consumer sentiments and preferences. Sentiment analysis of these reviews has become a powerful tool to uncover underlying consumer emotions and purchasing trends. However, traditional methods relying on shallow lexical features and classical machine learning algorithms often fall short in capturing the intricate and contextual patterns present in textual data. In this study, we propose the use of the large language model RoBERTa-Large to enhance sentiment classification performance by imposing its advanced contextual embeddings and attention mechanisms. This approach enables the capture of complex semantic relationships beyond surface-level word frequencies. Alongside sentiment analysis, we apply topic modeling using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) on publicly available datasets to identify prevalent themes and topics within consumer feedback. We perform a comprehensive comparison of RoBERTa against traditional machine learning and ensemble models using TF-IDF features, as well as deep learning architectures utilizing sentence embeddings and transformer-based models. Experimental results demonstrate that RoBERTa-Large achieves the highest accuracy of 93.59%, significantly outperforming baseline models. To enhance model transparency and trustworthiness, we apply SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) interpretability techniques, providing meaningful explanations of model predictions at both global and local levels.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDigital consumer behaviorLarge language modelNatural language processingOnline shoppingSentence embeddingsSentiment analysisTopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42031839
PMCPMC13276248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.