ArticleScientific reports2026
SegFormer-based boundary-aware polyp segmentation with adaptive multi-branch fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate definition of colorectal polyps for the prevention of cancer is challenging due to high variability in appearance and indefinite boundaries. In this work, we present a SegFormer-aided framework comprising a transformer encoder (SegFormer-B4) and a multi-branch fusion head in low-, high-, and all-level scales. Both tasks (edges and segmentation) are predicted by each branch and task-specific, learnable softmax weights then fuse branch logits. The framework is optimized under a composite objective comprising (i) deeply supervised soft dice similarity coefficient (DSC) loss for region overlap, (ii) Lovász-Hinge loss on the fusion head for compatibility for intersection over union (IoU) loss, and (iii) an edge-aware binary cross-entropy (BCE) term supervised by a Laplacian-based thin contour map. A lightweight pre-processing step removes textual overlays (OCR-inpainting-guided and specular highlights attenuation) for the removal of spurious cues. On three public datasets, the approach reaches excellent region and boundary precision: on Kvasir-Seg, mDice=0.946 and mIoU=0.899; on CVC-ClinicDB, mDice=0.961 and mIoU=0.926; and for ETIS (small low-contrast lesions), mDice=0.799 and mIoU=0.705, accompanied by top boundary-sensitive measures (S-measure, weighted [Formula: see text], and E-measure). The system is end-to-end, post-processing and any external prompting-free, and generalizes across datasets of varying difficulty, improving regional precision and boundary definition-two qualities desirable for clinical reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.