ArticleScientific reports2026
Feasibility and acceptability of a stress-management behavioral weight loss intervention for Black breast cancer survivors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This single-arm proof-of-concept study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of 'Survivors RESET', a stress management-enhanced behavioral weight loss intervention for Black female breast cancer survivors with obesity and high perceived stress. Participants received a 16-session, 4-month intervention based on the core curriculum of the Diabetes Prevention Program, enhanced with stress management and cancer-relevant content. Feasibility benchmarks were ≥ 45% enrollment, ≥ 75% retention, and ≥ 70% adherence; acceptability was ≥ 80% satisfaction. Exploratory weight loss analyses were performed. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests assessed changes from baseline to 4 months. Twenty women (90.9% of eligible individuals) enrolled (mean age: 57.9 ± 7.7 years; BMI: 37.10 ± 6.40 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.