Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A unified FLAIR hyperintensity segmentation model for various CNS tumor types and acquisition time points.

Mathilde Gajda Faanes, David Bouget, Asgeir S Jakola, Timothy R Smith, Vasileios K Kavouridis, Francesco Latini, Margret Jensdottir, Peter Milos, Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt, Rickard L Sjöberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mathilde Gajda FaanesDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway. mathilde.faanes@sintef.no.
David BougetDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Asgeir S JakolaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Timothy R SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Vasileios K KavouridisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Francesco LatiniDepartment Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Margret JensdottirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter MilosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Henrietta Nittby RedebrandtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Rickard L SjöbergDepartment of Clinical Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Rupavathana MahesparanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lars Kjelsberg PedersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ole SolheimDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ingerid ReinertsenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are important for diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of various brain tumors. Depending on the tumor type, the FLAIR hyperintensity volume is an important measure to assess the tumor volume, surrounding vasogenic edema, or treatment induced changes, such as gliosis. Automatic segmentation would therefore be valuable in the clinic and in clinical trials. In this study, around 5000 FLAIR images of various brain tumors types and acquisition time points, from different neurosurgical centers, were used to train a unified FLAIR hyperintensity segmentation model using an Attention U-Net architecture. The performance was compared against dataset-specific models and was validated on different tumor types, acquisition time points, and against BraTS. The unified model achieved an average Dice score of 88.65% for pre-operative meningiomas, 80.08% for pre-operative metastases, 90.92% for pre-operative and 84.60% for post-operative gliomas from BraTS, and 84.47% for pre-operative and 61.27% for post-operative lower grade gliomas. In addition, the results showed that the unified model achieved comparable segmentation performance to the dataset-specific models on their respective datasets. The documented generalization across tumor types and acquisition time points is a strong indicator for efficient deployment in a clinical setting. The model has been integrated into Raidionics, an open-source software for CNS tumor analysis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGliomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID42031792
PMCPMC13315698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.