ArticleScientific reports2026
A unified FLAIR hyperintensity segmentation model for various CNS tumor types and acquisition time points.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automatic and standardized reporting of perioperative MRIs in patients with central nervous system tumors.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are important for diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of various brain tumors. Depending on the tumor type, the FLAIR hyperintensity volume is an important measure to assess the tumor volume, surrounding vasogenic edema, or treatment induced changes, such as gliosis. Automatic segmentation would therefore be valuable in the clinic and in clinical trials. In this study, around 5000 FLAIR images of various brain tumors types and acquisition time points, from different neurosurgical centers, were used to train a unified FLAIR hyperintensity segmentation model using an Attention U-Net architecture. The performance was compared against dataset-specific models and was validated on different tumor types, acquisition time points, and against BraTS. The unified model achieved an average Dice score of 88.65% for pre-operative meningiomas, 80.08% for pre-operative metastases, 90.92% for pre-operative and 84.60% for post-operative gliomas from BraTS, and 84.47% for pre-operative and 61.27% for post-operative lower grade gliomas. In addition, the results showed that the unified model achieved comparable segmentation performance to the dataset-specific models on their respective datasets. The documented generalization across tumor types and acquisition time points is a strong indicator for efficient deployment in a clinical setting. The model has been integrated into Raidionics, an open-source software for CNS tumor analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.