ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
Adjuvant-induced macrophage activation compromises BA71ΔCD2-mediated protection against African swine fever virus.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct cytotoxic cell subsets underlie protective and non-protective immunity to African swine fever virus.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While effective subunit vaccines against African swine fever (ASF) are still under development, live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) remain the only approach capable of inducing robust protective immunity, though biosafety concerns limit their field use. Thus, further research is required to improve LAV safety while maintaining its immunogenicity. Because both the ASF virus (ASFV) and derived LAVs suppress macrophage innate responses, we hypothesized that adjuvants could restore functionality of LAV-infected cells, allowing dose reduction and consequently minimizing the risk of adverse events. To test this, we intranasally vaccinated pigs with a suboptimal dose of the LAV BA71ΔCD2, either alone or combined with two immunostimulatory adjuvants derived from Rothia nasimurium. Both immunostimulants enhanced the in vitro responsiveness of BA71ΔCD2-infected macrophages, which acquired antigen-presenting features. However, in vivo, both adjuvants lowered humoral and cellular responses induced by BA71ΔCD2, consequently decreasing protection against lethal challenge. Further in vitro analyses demonstrated that adjuvant-activated macrophages acquired an antiviral state, limiting LAV replication. These results suggest the hypothesis that reduced vaccine efficacy might result from insufficient antigen production. Overall, the study indicates that combining adjuvants with ASFV-based LAVs would require a fine-tune macrophage activation to enhance functionality without excessively inhibiting viral replication.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.