ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2026
Screening obstructive sleep apnea using clinical questionnaires and the triglyceride-glucose index: a cardiovascular risk-based approach.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent among patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, yet early detection in primary care remains difficult, particularly in individuals with subtle or absent symptoms, in whom screening questionnaires may have limited accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of five validated questionnaires and the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, alone and in combination, for detecting moderate-to-severe OSA in primary care patients stratified by CV risk. In this prospective study, 189 adults aged 18-75 years with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, or dyslipidemia were consecutively recruited from a primary care center in Spain. Participants completed the Berlin, STOP, STOP-BANG, NoSAS, and BASH-GN questionnaires, and the TyG index was calculated from fasting glucose and triglyceride levels. OSA was assessed using home sleep apnea testing, with moderate-to-severe OSA defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/h. CV risk was categorized using SCORE charts. Overall OSA prevalence was 57.7%, and 23.8% of participants had moderate-to-severe disease. Individually, questionnaires and TyG showed modest discrimination (AUC range 0.575-0.675). Diagnostic accuracy improved when strategies were tailored to CV risk: in low-to-moderate CV risk patients, TyG combined with the Berlin questionnaire achieved the best performance (AUC 0.740), whereas in high-to-very-high CV risk patients, the TyG plus STOP-BANG combination performed best (AUC 0.732). Notably, high-risk patients had more severe OSA but fewer typical symptoms, suggesting a "silent" phenotype. Integrating TyG with selected questionnaires may modestly enhance detection of clinically significant OSA in primary care, particularly when adapted to CV risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.