ArticleNature communications2026
Improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits by integrating massive types of functional annotation information.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Coding Negative Regulatory Features in Livestock Genomes: Functional Annotation and Causal Validation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Advances in Poultry RNA-Omics Research: Technologies, RNA Information Layers, and Applications in Complex Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits by integrating massive types of functional annotation information.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of omics techniques has increased the number of functional genomic annotations, making it possible to leverage this information in statistical models to improve genomic prediction performance. However, it remains challenging to effectively use the variety of functional annotations available. Here, we develop an adaptive model we call IFAM, which extends the linear mixed model with multiple random effects to accommodate a greater number of types of functional annotations to improve prediction accuracy for complex traits. The IFAM yields improvements in prediction accuracy across diverse datasets compared to the GBLUP model, achieving an average improvement of 9.46%, 6.15%, 4.59%, 4.09%, and 10.83% in the WTCCC1, UK Biobank, Duroc pig, Yorkshire pig and rice datasets, respectively. Notably, excluding trait-specific GWAS-derived annotations, functional annotations alone yielded a 1.40% predictive gain for the UK Biobank dataset but only marginal improvements in livestock and crop datasets. This suggests that the effectiveness of multi-omics information is constrained by species-specific annotation quality, tissue and trait relevance, and the limited resolution of existing functional datasets. As functional genomics resources continue to expand, their integration is expected to provide increasing benefits for genomic prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.