Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031771›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits by integrating massive types of functional annotation information.

Zhenshuang Tang, Xiong Xiong, Haohao Zhang, Dong Yin, Yuhua Fu, Yunxia Zhao, Jingjin Li, Yuan Quan, Xiang Zhou, Xinyun Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhenshuang TangYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.
Xiong XiongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-9733
Haohao ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-5228
Dong YinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yuhua FuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yunxia ZhaoYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.
Jingjin LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yuan QuanCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xinyun LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-1713
Lilin YinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. ylilin@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-7976
Shuhong ZhaoYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China. zhaoshuhong@yzwlab.cn.
Xiaolei LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. xiaoleiliu@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-1426

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32272841Wellcome Trust 085475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of omics techniques has increased the number of functional genomic annotations, making it possible to leverage this information in statistical models to improve genomic prediction performance. However, it remains challenging to effectively use the variety of functional annotations available. Here, we develop an adaptive model we call IFAM, which extends the linear mixed model with multiple random effects to accommodate a greater number of types of functional annotations to improve prediction accuracy for complex traits. The IFAM yields improvements in prediction accuracy across diverse datasets compared to the GBLUP model, achieving an average improvement of 9.46%, 6.15%, 4.59%, 4.09%, and 10.83% in the WTCCC1, UK Biobank, Duroc pig, Yorkshire pig and rice datasets, respectively. Notably, excluding trait-specific GWAS-derived annotations, functional annotations alone yielded a 1.40% predictive gain for the UK Biobank dataset but only marginal improvements in livestock and crop datasets. This suggests that the effectiveness of multi-omics information is constrained by species-specific annotation quality, tissue and trait relevance, and the limited resolution of existing functional datasets. As functional genomics resources continue to expand, their integration is expected to provide increasing benefits for genomic prediction.

Indexed as

GenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultifactorial InheritanceAnimalsDatabases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLivestockModels, GeneticOryzaPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Trait LociSwineUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID42031771
PMCPMC13319817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.