ArticleNature communications2026
Signal-screening-guided response-contribution-correlation framework reveals instability evolution in biogas system processing organic waste.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biogas system plays a crucial role in sustainable waste-to-energy strategies. However, instability in practical urban applications hinders its promotion and development. To deepen understanding of this instability, we employed a multi-dimensional dynamic indicator early-warning platform to screen instability signals based on a simulated biogas system. Key indicators were selected as instability factors, and their reliability as signals was confirmed. Thus, we analyzed the onset and evolution of instability by integrating response-contribution-correlation analysis, and proposed an instability curve to describe system instability. The results revealed a three-stage evolution process in biogas system instability: an initial lag phase, followed by mid-term acceleration, and eventual stabilization. The sustained response of the dominant instability factor to other instability factors marked the formal onset of system instability, while the subsequent response path maintained the system in a low-efficiency state. Additionally, we found that shifts in the contribution of instability factors to methane production accelerated instability progression, whereas the gradually increasing correlation among instability factors stabilized and reinforced the instability process. Overall, the findings revealed underlying mechanisms and staged evolution patterns of instability in the biogas system, offering insights and technical support for the stable application of sustainable waste-to-energy systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.