ArticleNature communications2026
Digital defocus aberration interference for automated optical microscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automation in optical microscopy is critical for enabling high-throughput imaging across a wide range of biomedical applications. Among the essential components of automated systems, robust autofocusing plays a pivotal role in maintaining image quality for both single-plane and volumetric imaging. However, conventional autofocusing methods often struggle with implementation complexity, limited generalizability across sample types, incompatibility with thick specimens, and slow feedback. We observed that the digitally summed Fourier spectrum of two images acquired from two-angle illumination exhibits interference-like fringe modulation when the sample is defocused. These digital fringes correlate directly with defocus through a physics-based relation. Based on this principle, we developed an automatic, efficient, and generalizable defocus detection method termed digital defocus aberration interference (DAbI). Implemented with a simple two-LED setup, DAbI can quantify the defocus distance over a range of 443 times the depth-of-field for thin samples and 296 times for thick specimens. It can additionally extend the natural depth-of-field of the imaging system by 20-fold when integrated with complex-field imaging. We demonstrated the versatile applications of DAbI on brightfield, complex-field, refractive index, confocal, and widefield fluorescence imaging, establishing it as a promising solution for automated, high-throughput optical microscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.