Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Blind image quality assessment based on statistical features.

Wentao Ji, Xing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wentao JiCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, Sichuan, China. jiwentao2008@qq.com.cn.
Xing ChenCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) is challenging due to the absence of reference images. Natural Scene Statistics (NSS) provides a robust foundation for NR-IQA. However, BRISQUE relies on the statistical features of image intensity and imposes a strong zero-mean assumption, which may not hold in practice and could limit its performance. This paper proposes a novel NR-IQA method, the Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on Statistical Features (BIQABSF) algorithm, which introduces two key improvements. First, we utilize the statistical features of log-contrast (LC), which more closely align with human visual perception. Second, the distribution of the locally normalized LC was modeled using a generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD) without a zero-mean constraint, based on the empirical observation of its asymmetric nature. Specifically, we compute the Local Mean Subtracted Log-Contrast (LMSLC) and extract its distribution parameters as features for training a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model. Extensive experiments on the LIVE, TID2013,KADID-10k, and CSIQ databases demonstrated that BIQABSF achieved highly competitive performance, even surpassing several deep learning-based methods in terms of efficiency and generalization, thereby demonstrating its potential as an efficient and generalizable solution for real-world applications.

Indexed as

Blind image quality assessmentLog-contrastStatistical analysis of imagesSupport vector regression

Identifiers

PMID42031758
PMCPMC13168472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.