ArticleScientific reports2026
Electronic health record dynamic features for in-hospital death among chronic kidney disease patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of in-hospital death in chronic kidney disease (CKD) cohorts could aid medical resource allocation to reduce mortality. The relative contribution of dynamic data based on electronic health record (EHR) for prediction of CKD patients in-hospital death remains understudied. In this retrospective cohort study based on EHR data from the First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital and the Sixth Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, a long short-term memory (LSTM) model and a logistic regression (LR) feature engineer model based on sequential data, and a LR baseline model based on static data were developed to predict in-hospital death among CKD patients. The LSTM model, the LR feature engineer model, and the LR baseline model were compared. And the LSTM model was evaluated with different length of window size. Among 16,109 CKD hospitalized patients from two hospitals, 1196 (7.42%) in-hospital death were observed. The LSTM model was associated with an AUC of 0.978 (0.966-0.991) in the internal test set, and an AUC of 0.927 (0.909-0.946) in the external test set. The LSTM model showed better performance than the LR baseline model and the logistic regression feature engineer model (p < 0.001). The LSTM model with 6-day sequential data could excel the performance of the LR feature engineer using the whole sequence data. In this study, these results suggested that the LSTM model using time sequential laboratory indicators contributed to earlier and more accurate prediction for in-hospital mortality in the CKD cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.