ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
A 1-year forensic evaluation of DNA degradation and STR typing in embalmed human tissues: Muscle, brain, liver, and bone marrow.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A 1-year forensic evaluation of DNA degradation and STR typing in embalmed human tissues: Muscle, brain, liver, and bone marrow.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postmortem perfusion is a procedure which provides in-vivo fixation of the human body and prevents organ and tissue decomposition after biological death occurs. Formaldehyde-based embalming solutions influence nucleic acid degradation, which reduces the quality and quantity of DNA extracted and the effectiveness of short tandem repeat (STR) typing. This research is a 1-year study aimed at determining the timeframe within which viable DNA profiles can be generated from different tissue types, post-embalming. Samples from the bone marrow (tibia), trapezius and quadriceps muscles, liver, and brain tissues were collected before embalming and at seven time points post-embalming. DNA extraction and quantification were performed on each sample to assess whether sufficient DNA was available for testing. Samples with DNA quantities over 0.05 ng/μL underwent amplification and STR analysis to produce DNA profiles. Quantification values and profile quality were compared across tissue types and time points. Results showed that prolonged exposure to embalming solutions significantly reduced DNA quality, leading to less discernible profiles. Statistically significant differences were detected among all tissue types at all time periods. Liver and brain samples retained more DNA than bone marrow, trapezius, and quadricep muscle samples. Qualitative evaluation of ski slope patterns in liver STR profiles demonstrated increasing signal degradation over time and was consistent across loci, suggesting predictable fragment length-dependent decline. This study suggests that after embalming, the liver is the preferential tissue for recovering DNA for forensic analysis, as the liver samples were the most robust and the only sample type to yield DNA profiles up to 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.