ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Performance of DRNNAGE for macroscopic age-at-death estimation in contemporary Brazilian identified skeletons.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of DRNNAGE for macroscopic age-at-death estimation in contemporary Brazilian identified skeletons.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In global forensic literature, methods for estimating age in young individuals are more commonly addressed than those applicable to adults. This trend is also evident in Brazil. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the DRNNAGE software for age estimation in Brazilian identified human skeletons. The sample consisted of 400 skeletons (200 females and 200 males), aged 20 years and older, from the osteological collection of the Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology at the University of Pernambuco (CEAF/UPE). The DRNNAGE trait scoring system was applied to analyze morphological features of the cranial sutures, vertebrae, upper and lower limbs, fusion of the first and second sacral vertebrae, clavicles, first rib, pubic symphysis, sacroiliac joint, and acetabulum. Cohen's Kappa was used to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed in IBM™ SPSS® (version 22.0), R (version 4.3.3), and RStudio IDE (version 2023.12.1). Neither sex nor antimeric variation influenced the classification of bone maturation stages. DRNNAGE achieves 6.54-year MAE and 90.2% empirical coverage (90% nominal) in a Brazilian sample. The software performed satisfactorily in this sample and reinforces the importance of further regional studies to assess its nationwide applicability, considering Brazil's continental dimensions and diverse population structure, taking into account the well-known intra- and inter-population variability in human aging patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.