Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42031556›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Attack Repertoires in Outbred Male CD1-Mice Are Associated with Nucleus Accumbens Neuroligin-2.

Nastacia L Goodwin, Pranav Anumolu, Natalie P Hoffman, Ainsley C Barrow, Valerie S Tsai, Lukas K MacMillen, Sam A Golden, Mitra Heshmati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nastacia L GoodwinCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-1059-7491
Pranav AnumoluCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Natalie P HoffmanCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ainsley C BarrowCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Valerie S TsaiCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lukas K MacMillenCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Sam A GoldenCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington sagolden@uw.edu mhesh@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-2272
Mitra HeshmatiCenter for Excellence in the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington sagolden@uw.edu mhesh@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-558X

Funding

Mechanisms of emergence from general anesthesiaR35GM146751 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mitra Heshmati · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggression may be behaviorally distinguished by reactive or appetitive properties. Here, we use a model of operant aggression administration, in which outbred male CD-1 mice lever press (contingent) or do not lever press (noncontingent) to attack an intruder mouse, to examine behavioral differences in aggression reinforcement. Contingent reinforcement identifies the behavioral and neural basis of appetitive, or rewarding, aggression self-administration, while noncontingent reinforcement isolates reactive, or involuntary, components. Females are not used in this study due to their low propensity to attack. We applied supervised machine-guided behavioral classification and Shapley additive scores (SHAP) to describe differences and similarities in attack behavior features. We find that behavioral sequences of an attack bout are similar whether aggression reinforcement is contingent or noncontingent, though underlying neural mechanisms differ. Fos immunolabeling following operant reinforcement reveals distinct network activity patterns between contingent and noncontingent groups, supporting distinct neural mechanisms in appetitive or reactive aggression. We further identify high Fos activity in nucleus accumbens (NAc) in both contingent and noncontingent groups. NAc activity and changes in NAc neuroligin-2 (NLGN2) expression are associated with aggressive behavior. We find that the number of attack bouts is negatively correlated with NAc NLGN2 immunolabeling, regardless of contingent or noncontingent intruder presentation. As a result, molecularly dissociable features do not necessarily reflect operant behavioral repertoires.

Indexed as

AggressionCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroliginsNucleus AccumbensAnimalsConditioning, OperantMaleMiceProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosReinforcement, PsychologyCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalNerve Tissue Proteinsneuroligin 2NeuroliginsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosaggressionappetitiveCD-1 miceneuroligin-2operantreactive

Identifiers

PMID42031556
PMCPMC13183368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.